Dumplin' Needs Some Right Guard

September 5, 2008 vs Dumplin Dumbash

Yawn....sorry. I was checking to see if Dumplin's latest diatribe against Geisler and Turek contained any real scholarship or anything new.

Hum. Appeal to a "spiritual resurrection" as early Christian belief. Nope. Old news.

Usual failure to distinguish between stories becoming distorted and becoming accepted as fact, with the usual canard-appeal to "credulous and superstitous believers" and the "waaah, God doesn't kiss my butt in real life" hobby horse. Check.

Hum, what's this idiocy? As a matter of fact, according to Matthew 28, there were conflicting eyewitness accounts at the time Matthew was writing his gospel. Say WHAT? Oh. He cites the guards being bribed into giving a false story. Yep, that's a conflicting "eyewitness account" all right. Sheesh.

Old wah wah about the guards not being posted until the Sabbath. Yawn. Wake me up when he says something new.

Call Dumplin' behind the times.

Posted in Dumb Anti-apologetics.